This article appeared in the September/October
2003 issue of PT. To purchase this issue and receive this and
other valuable articles in this
issue, CLICK
HERE: Ship
within the U.S. | Ship
outside the U.S.
by Paul Schranz and Kelly Blok
This is the first of three articles examining the
complexities and controversies of calibrating digital images. This
article covers monitors, monitor calibration, and viewing environments.
The second will concern photographers who still use film, but scan
their images for output on inkjet printers. The final installment
will serve as a guide to photographers who use a high-end digital
camera and send their images to a professional lab for output.
Overwhelming amount of information
The amount of information on profiles and digital color management
seems endless, highly opinionated, and mostly out-of-date. It
also incorporates different standards for a variety of applications.
While the digital world gives us capabilities that conventional
photography does not, they come with a greater set of responsibilities.
Quality digital work is no more automatic than quality conventional
photography. All the subtleties that go into making a brilliant
silver print are equally complex in producing a quality digitally
based photograph. Our intentions are to simplify all of this.
Another issue is Photoshop. Photoshop is an easy
program to do a lot of things wrong. It’s also an excellent and complex
program that does things very right. Too many people neither appreciate
nor take the time to learn the fine qualities of this program.
If you’re going to do serious digital photography, learn
Photoshop. Not a little—a lot.
To
get this article in its entirety, click below to order
issue.
CLICK
HERE: Ship
within the U.S. | Ship
outside the U.S.
©2006
Preston Publications. All rights reserved. No part of this
material may be reproduced, transmitted, or stored in a
retrieval system for public or private use without the written
permission of the publisher.

|